Mosque to Temple: Quest for Unity?
Succinct History:
The Babri Mosque, built in 1528
by Mughal commander Mir Baqi under Babur's rule, became a source of conflict
when a Hindu sect claimed a temple was destroyed during Babur's reign. In 1859,
the British partitioned the site, allowing Muslims to pray inside and Hindus in
the outer courtyard. The mosque became a disputed property in 1949, leading to
civil suits. In 1992, a Hindu nationalist mob tore down the mosque, triggering
riots. The Liberhan Commission implicated BJP leaders, and in 2010, the
Allahabad High Court ruled for a shared site. The Supreme Court suspended the
ruling in 2011. Attempts at an out-of-court settlement and conspiracy charges
followed. The Supreme Court's 2019 ruling awarded the land for a Hindu temple
and a separate piece for Muslims. The Shree Ram Janmabhoomi Teerth Kshetra
Trust was set up in 2020, and on January 22, 2024, the Ram temple was
consecrated in Ayodhya despite some pending construction.
Contemporary Scenario:
Al Jazeera writes, “The
inauguration of the temple is being seen as a symbol of religious triumphalism,
turning India’s secular democracy into a Hindu-first nation,
further polarising politics that will likely benefit the governing
Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) months ahead of general elections.” Religion
is evidently employed in the state’s politics. As it has consistently been the
case.
Indian Muslims constitute the
largest minority group, have witnessed escalating religious tensions since
2014. According to an Al Jazeera article, Ayodhya holds distinct significance
for Hindu resident Das, who sees it as Ram's birthplace and the location of a
sacred temple, realizing the aspirations of his forefathers. Conversely, for
Muslim resident Abidi, the transformations, including the district's renaming
from Faizabad to Ayodhya, signify the erasure of Muslim identifiers. The
construction of the Ram temple and the government's trend of replacing Muslim
names with Hindu ones may contribute to the city's economic growth but appear
to dehumanise and humiliate Muslims. Under Modi's authoritative leadership,
religious divides have intensified, resulting in violence, discrimination, and
economic hardships for Muslims, prompting Abidi to voice concerns about India's
secular future. Despite differing viewpoints, Ayodhya's Muslims have made
concessions to ease tensions with Hindu neighbours, reflecting the broader
challenges faced by religious minorities in India.
This is the 'rashtra mandir,'
asserted Adityanath, highlighting the historic significance of the consecration
of the Ram idol as a moment of national pride. He expressed the belief that,
with the grace of Ram, the streets of Ayodhya would no longer resonate with the
sound of bullets, and curfews would be unnecessary. Instead, the city would
witness vibrant celebrations such as 'Deepotsav,' 'Ramotsav,' and 'Shri Ram
Sankirtan.' Adityanath emphasised that the presence of Ram in Avadhpuri
symbolises the proclamation of Ram Rajya, envisioning a harmonious and peaceful
era.
A collective press note issued
by 22 Indian Diaspora organisations expressed deep concern over the worrisome
'precedent' established by the inauguration of the temple on January 22, 2024.
Disturbing incidents were reported, including in Mumbai, where individuals
adorned in saffron reportedly carried guns, shouted provocative slogans, and
compelled a Muslim man to chant 'Jai Shri Ram.' In Telangana, a mob was said to
have danced in front of a mosque, while in Kanpur, Hindu students allegedly
chanted anti-Muslim slogans and verbally abused Allah SWT. These incidents
underscored the apprehensions about rising tensions and divisive actions
following the temple's inauguration. The reported incidents are unfortunately
not isolated occurrences. Small-scale incidents of this nature, encompassing
activities such as the demolition of houses and shops, mob lynching,
harassment, and calls for genocide, have been distressingly prevalent. These
events underscore a broader and deeply concerning pattern of religious tensions
and communal discord that persists in various parts of the country.
Pressing Questions:
The pressing question emerges:
can concessions, non-interference, or collective prayers truly bring about a
resolution without resistance? Will the Indian Muslims persist in the hope that
'peace' will eventually be reinstated, allowing them to live without constant
fear and underlying unease? The ongoing struggle to find alternative ways of
existence, navigating a reality where one's identity is consistently
interrogated, raises serious concerns.
Allah SWT mentions in Surah
Baqarah, Verse 190, "Fight in the way of Allah those who fight you
but do not transgress. Indeed. Allah does not like transgressors."
And Allah says in Surah As-Saf,
Verse: 8, “They wish to extinguish Allah’s light with their mouths, but
Allah will ˹certainly˺ perfect His light, even to the dismay of the
disbelievers.”
We need to inquire whether
accomplishments can be achieved without our exertions.
This era is a testament to the
strength of faith and the importance of practicing one's religious beliefs,
even in the most challenging circumstances.
Where do we stand?
Written By:
Faculty of Law
Aligarh Muslim University



Comments
Post a Comment